Please rotate your phone.

This experience is designed for portrait mode.

AI Product Tools  /  MIF Explorer  /  Library

Explore the framework

38 curated entries spanning KPIs, governance metrics, value metrics, enablement signals, capability growth, maturity indicators, and AI-aware signals.

Find what to measure Analyze my stack

Explorer mode

MIF

MIF stands for Measurement Intelligence Framework. It is a broader way to organize measurement so teams look beyond a few headline KPIs.

Why it matters: Modern product teams need to measure UX, AI quality, governance, value, enablement, and maturity together.

Example: A healthy stack might combine Task Success Rate, Design System Cost Recovery Ratio, and User Override Rate.

Full MIF mode is on. KPIs stay visible alongside governance, value, enablement, capability, maturity, and AI-aware measures.

1

Search or filter the framework

Narrow the library by class, domain, truth layer, or audience.

2

Add the entries that belong in your stack

Use the Add buttons to build the set you want to analyze.

3

Then use Analyze my stack

That takes you into the health-check workspace, where you can run the actual analysis.

Measurement class

Measurement Class

A measurement class tells you what kind of measure something is, not just what topic it covers.

Why it matters: It stops teams from building a stack full of only KPIs while ignoring value, governance, or AI signals.

Example: Governance Metric and AI Signal are two different measurement classes.

Domain

Category

Usability

Task Success Rate

MeaningfulLaggingAI-Sensitive

The percentage of users who complete a defined task without critical errors.

Evaluating whether a redesign improved core workflows

Usability

Time on Task

MeaningfulLeadingAI-Sensitive

The time it takes a user to complete a specific task from start to finish.

Measuring efficiency improvements after a redesign

Usability

Error Rate

MeaningfulLeading

The percentage of user actions that result in an error, mistake, or unintended outcome.

Identifying specific UI elements that cause confusion

Usability

System Usability Scale (SUS)

MeaningfulLagging

A standardized 10-question survey that produces a composite usability score from 0 to 100.

Benchmarking perceived usability over time

Adoption

Activation Rate

MeaningfulLeading

The percentage of new users who complete a key action that signals they have found initial value in the product.

Evaluating onboarding effectiveness

Adoption

Feature Adoption Rate

DirectionalLeadingAI-Sensitive

The percentage of active users who use a specific feature within a given time period.

Evaluating feature launch success

Adoption

Time to First Value

MeaningfulLeading

The time from signup to the moment a user experiences the product’s core value for the first time.

Optimizing onboarding flows

Adoption

Onboarding Completion Rate

DirectionalLeadingVanity Risk

The percentage of new users who complete all required onboarding steps.

Identifying which onboarding steps cause the most drop-off

Engagement

DAU/WAU Ratio

DirectionalLeadingAI-Sensitive

The ratio of daily active users to weekly active users, indicating how many days per week the average user returns.

Understanding how embedded the product is in users’ workflows

Engagement

Average Session Duration

DirectionalVanity RiskAI-Sensitive

The average time users spend in a single session.

Content and media products where longer time indicates consumption

Engagement

Depth of Use

DirectionalLeading

The number of distinct features or meaningful actions a user engages with in a session or time period.

Understanding whether users are discovering the full value of the product

Engagement

Return Visit Rate

MeaningfulLeading

The percentage of users who return to the product within a defined time window after their first visit.

Early indicator of product-market fit

Retention

Day 7 Retention

MeaningfulLeading

The percentage of users who return to the product on day 7 after their first use.

Predicting long-term retention from early user behavior

Retention

Day 30 Retention

MeaningfulLagging

The percentage of users who return to the product on day 30 after their first use.

Evaluating product-market fit

Retention

Churn Rate

MeaningfulLagging

The percentage of users or customers who stop using the product within a given time period.

Measuring overall product health

Retention

Feature Retention

MeaningfulLeading

The percentage of users who continue using a specific feature over time after first trying it.

Evaluating whether a new feature is delivering sustained value

Conversion

Conversion Rate

MeaningfulLagging

The percentage of users who complete a desired business action, such as purchasing, subscribing, or requesting a demo.

Measuring funnel effectiveness

Conversion

Funnel Drop-off Rate

MeaningfulLeading

The percentage of users who leave a multi-step process at each specific step.

Diagnosing conversion bottlenecks

Conversion

Cart Abandonment Rate

MeaningfulLaggingMisused

The percentage of users who add items to a cart but do not complete the purchase.

Optimizing e-commerce checkout flows

Conversion

Free-to-Paid Conversion Rate

MeaningfulLagging

The percentage of free or trial users who convert to a paid plan.

Evaluating freemium or trial model effectiveness

Trust

Net Promoter Score (NPS)

DirectionalLaggingVanity Risk

A survey-based score measuring how likely users are to recommend the product, calculated as the difference between promoters and detractors.

Tracking overall sentiment trends over time

Trust

Customer Satisfaction (CSAT)

MeaningfulLagging

A survey-based score measuring satisfaction with a specific interaction, feature, or experience, typically on a 1-5 or 1-7 scale.

Measuring satisfaction with specific features or support interactions

Trust

Customer Effort Score (CES)

MeaningfulLeading

A survey-based score measuring how much effort a user had to exert to complete a task or interaction.

Measuring effort reduction after UX improvements

Trust

Support Ticket Volume

DirectionalLagging

The number of support tickets or help requests submitted by users in a given period.

Identifying features that cause the most confusion

AI Quality

AI Task Completion Rate

MeaningfulLaggingAI-Sensitive

The percentage of tasks where AI assistance leads to successful completion.

Evaluating whether AI features are effective

AI Quality

AI Suggestion Acceptance Rate

DirectionalLeadingAI-Sensitive

The percentage of AI-generated suggestions that users accept and apply.

Evaluating AI suggestion quality

AI Quality

User Override Rate

MeaningfulLeadingAI-Sensitive

The percentage of AI outputs that users manually modify, correct, or override after initial acceptance.

Evaluating AI output quality and appropriateness

AI Quality

AI Confidence Calibration

MeaningfulLeadingAI-Sensitive

How well the AI’s stated confidence level matches actual outcome accuracy. When the AI says it’s 80% confident, it should be correct 80% of the time.

Evaluating whether AI confidence indicators help or mislead users

Trust

Governance Decision Cycle Time

MeaningfulLeading

The time it takes for a governance question, exception, or standards decision to move from request to final answer.

Measuring design system governance health

Trust

Governance Exception Rate

DirectionalLeadingMisused

The percentage of work that requires an exception to the current system, standards, or operating model.

Evaluating design system governance fit

Conversion

Design System Cost Recovery Ratio

MeaningfulLagging

The ratio between measurable design system value recovered and the annual cost to run the system.

Justifying design system investment

Adoption

Design System Contribution Cycle Time

DirectionalLeading

The time it takes for a team-submitted pattern or improvement to move from proposal to usable system asset.

Measuring whether the design system is collaborative and scalable

Adoption

Engineering Sandbox Adoption Rate

DirectionalLeading

The percentage of eligible engineers actively using the sanctioned sandbox, starter kit, or implementation playground for system work.

Evaluating design system enablement investments

Engagement

Design-to-Code Learning Velocity

DirectionalLeading

The rate at which designers build practical implementation fluency and can apply code-aware knowledge in real workflow decisions.

Measuring hybrid talent development

Engagement

Cross-Training Application Rate

MeaningfulLeading

The percentage of cross-training moments that turn into applied behavior in real delivery work.

Measuring hybrid team growth

Trust

Leadership Measurement Alignment Score

DirectionalLeading

A structured score for how consistently leadership understands, repeats, and supports the current measurement narrative.

Selling a measurement system internally

Adoption

Internal UX Narrative Reuse Rate

DirectionalLeading

How often the approved UX, design system, or AI measurement narrative is reused by partners outside the core team.

Measuring internal buy-in for UX or design system strategy

Retention

AI Pilot-to-Scale Conversion Rate

MeaningfulLaggingAI-Sensitive

The percentage of AI pilots that move from limited experiment to sustained scaled use.

Evaluating AI strategy maturity